Pogue - Twitter Pogue  November 10, 2009  feed Do you guys think Apple should back down on this iPhone-app rejection? http://www.tomrichmond.com/blog/2009/11/...

Share/Bookmark

This tweet received 111 twitter mentions (111 replies and 0 retweet) from 110 distinct twitter users.

This conversation is linked to the Twitter United States country and Twitter News category.

 

111 twitter replies

  • kepstein - Twitter kepstein  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Yes!

  • Hollenbach - Twitter Hollenbach  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue David the bit.ly link is bad. Sorry.

  • markwarren - Twitter markwarren  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue You killed Tom's blog. Backup source?

  • shoshido - Twitter shoshido  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue "because it contains content that ridicules public figures"? This nation was FOUNDED on satire! What is democracy w/o it, "Apple"?!?

  • kompakter - Twitter kompakter  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Considering the amount of garbage that DOES get through, yeah.

  • skylineproject - Twitter skylineproject  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue I think the proprietary nature of the app store is helpful, but they need to hire millions/get computers to expedite the process

  • RandomStep - Twitter RandomStep  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Absolutely they should approve that app. I'm not a fan of anything goes, but that app is nowhere near crossing any 'bright red' lines

  • rogeraberg - Twitter rogeraberg  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Another strange rejection http://suprb.com/dropular-vs-apple/

  • mtkr - Twitter mtkr  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Got an error message on your last link.

  • geoff_green - Twitter geoff_green  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue yes

  • OJTien - Twitter OJTien  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue I think that they're justified as the caricatures released in the future may be far more insulting in their teasing. It's a stretch

  • reldnahcire - Twitter reldnahcire  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Yes

  • strbuk - Twitter strbuk  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue No

  • MarkSoFla - Twitter MarkSoFla  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue I think they should allow it.Nothing in there that's offensive,and nothing different than a newspaper might print any day of the week

  • jsncampbell - Twitter jsncampbell  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Looks like your tweet crashed Tom's blog

  • LisaRead - Twitter LisaRead  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue it's just more Political Correctness gone horribly awry. It would really help people get to know their representatives....#badChoice

  • gwcoffey - Twitter gwcoffey  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Apple should back down on all editorializing. Insecure? Reject. Unstable? Reject. Offensive, obnoxious, pointless or puerile? Rate.

  • Balloon__Boys - Twitter Balloon__Boys  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Hey I'm a developer. They reject for lesser stuff than that, but this one got thru- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tksMKc0P...

  • lenpoche - Twitter lenpoche  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue definitely!!! Doesn't Apple have an appeals process? Oh! Google would know....

  • FredAvolio - Twitter FredAvolio  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue of course "yes," but the web site is probably overloaded now.

  • Anachromage - Twitter Anachromage  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue I normally like Apple but yes, that is ridiculous. Shouldn't be restricting what consumers put on the devices they paid for, at all.

  • srgroves - Twitter srgroves  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue yes! Apple is getting out of hand with rejections. Would love this app.

  • theschnitzer - Twitter theschnitzer  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Absolutely! All members rendered equally. 1st time I'm seriously questioning being an Apple customer.

  • zrobyna1 - Twitter zrobyna1  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue no.

  • tljackson4 - Twitter tljackson4  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Last I looked, that app would be protected speech. I think Apple is way off base.

  • LarryLucio - Twitter LarryLucio  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue • I'd be curious to see their "caricatures" of the people of color bcuz they only included white politicians in the screen grabs.

  • ljharb - Twitter ljharb  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue A thousand times yes.

  • trifster - Twitter trifster  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue yes. And googles. And that book b/c it had "iPhone" in title. All stupid rejections.

  • nickprincipe - Twitter nickprincipe  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Apple, yet again, is being ridiculous - looks like a great app!

  • loyalmoses - Twitter loyalmoses  November 10, 2009  Log in to Reply

    @Pogue Yup... too much censorship.

 
 

Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.